Rethinking Who Pays in Irrigation AgTech with Jairo Trad

Despite its importance to both agricultural and environmental outcomes, irrigation has not been a terribly successful subsection of agtech. We have our theories about why that is (we wrote a whole report about it, The agtech adoption dilemma: Irrigation), and many others have also spotted the challenges in this space. 

But when Jairo Trad and his team dug in, they saw an opportunity for business model innovation. Their path, via Argentinian agtech company Kilimo, has been far from smooth, but where they’ve ended up seems to be a unique unlock for adoption and value capture. 

This week, we’re sitting down with Jairo, CEO and Cofounder at Kilimo, who’s spent the last 14 years expanding the boundaries of the ag-water system to find the right answer to the question “who pays for water efficiency improvements.” We discuss:: 

  • Why deploying irrigation hardware in agriculture was not the right model for Kilimo 
  • The rational reasons why farmers avoid the pursuit of water efficiency, and how to leverage these reasons to encourage change
  • How the combination of sticky products and financial innovation align incentives among a diverse cohort of customers, stakeholders, and partners

Useful Links:

The information in this post is not investment advice or a recommendation to invest. It is general information only and does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making an investment decision you should read the information memorandum and seek financial advice from a professional financial adviser. Whilst we believe Information is correct, no warranty of accuracy, reliability or completeness.

No items found.

Want more content like this? Sign up for our weekly insights.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Key takeaways

  • [00:09:59] Good startup founders are like cockroaches 
  • [00:18:24] Farmers don’t use tech they don’t pay for
  • [00:25:52] Learning from unsuccessful carbon and ecosystem markets

Get this report